<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Benchmarking OSs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probably.co.uk/more-on-benchmarking-oss.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probably.co.uk/more-on-benchmarking-oss.html</link>
	<description>Random musings, mostly about UNIX</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://probably.co.uk/more-on-benchmarking-oss.html/comment-page-1#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probably.co.uk/?p=175#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>And I suspect they use more modern compiler options too. Is it the case that RedHat still compile practically everything as i386?

Whatever, OpenSolaris was *still* quicker ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I suspect they use more modern compiler options too. Is it the case that RedHat still compile practically everything as i386?</p>
<p>Whatever, OpenSolaris was *still* quicker ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Law</title>
		<link>http://probably.co.uk/more-on-benchmarking-oss.html/comment-page-1#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probably.co.uk/?p=175#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>The gap between Ubuntu and CentOS (Red Hat) can be explained: Red Hat is ultra-conservative in its use of kernels, and ends up with old(-ish) ones, with myriad backported fixes. Ubuntu is closer to the current Linux kernel, with all those accumulated go-faster stripes...

That&#039;s my theory anyway  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gap between Ubuntu and CentOS (Red Hat) can be explained: Red Hat is ultra-conservative in its use of kernels, and ends up with old(-ish) ones, with myriad backported fixes. Ubuntu is closer to the current Linux kernel, with all those accumulated go-faster stripes&#8230;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my theory anyway  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
